A biomechanical comparison of elite swimmers start performance using the traditional track start and the new kick start
(Ein biomechnischer Vergleich der Startleistung von Spitzenschwimmern beim traditionellen Schrittstart vs. dem neuen Kickstart)
INTRODUCTION: The international governing body for swimming (FINA) has approved the use of a new starting block (Omega, OSB11) with an inclined kick plate. This has required the development of a kick start technique. The kick plate is angled at 30° to the surface of the block and can move through five different locations on the platform. To date, no study has examined the biomechanical factors associated with a start using the OSB11. Hence, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the new start platform on performance, relative to that of the track start. METHODS: The study utilised 14 elite swimmers (nine male aged 20.8 ± 3.0 years, five female aged 21.4 ± 2.8 years) all of which had personal best times which attained a minimum of 850 FINA points. Each completed six dive and glide starts (three kick starts and three track starts) in a randomised sequence. The analysis system calculated the overall force profile of the start. It utilised an instrumented start block including the measurement of the rear foot through a second instrumented incline plate. The system included a series of calibrated high speed digital cameras, one above water to capture the start and three underwater to obtain vision from 0 m to 15 m. A video camera timing system was used to obtain the times to 5 m and 7.5 m. RESULTS: The mean time on block was 0.77 s for the kick start, which was significantly less (p<0.01) than the track start 0.80 s. The kick start was also significantly faster (p<0.05) to 5 m and 7.5 m than the track start (1.62 s & 2.69 s compared to 1.66 s & 2.73 s, respectively). The kick start produced a significantly higher (p<0.01) horizontal take-off velocity (4.48 m/s) compared to the track start (4.41 m/s) and a higher average horizontal force (0.60 N/kg compared to 0.57 N/kg). The average velocity between 5 m and 7.5 m was not significantly different (p>0.05) between the two techniques. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate that the kick start on the new OSB11 start platform was significantly faster than the track start. Despite the participant`s own bias towards their preferred technique being the track start, the kick start was significantly faster off the block; with a higher horizontal velocity and an increased on block horizontal force. This advantage was maintained through the time to 5 m and 7.5 m. This preliminary research indicates that coaches and athletes should spend time adapting to the new block and the new starting technique.
© Copyright 2010 Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI. Veröffentlicht von Norwegian School of Sport Sciences. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
| Schlagworte: | |
|---|---|
| Notationen: | Ausdauersportarten |
| Tagging: | Startblock |
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI |
| Dokumentenart: | Beitrag aus Sammelwerk |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oslo
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
2010
|
| Online-Zugang: | https://open-archive.sport-iat.de/bms/11_94-96_Honda.pdf |
| Seiten: | 94-96 |
| Level: | hoch |